You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MorphoGraphX: A platform for quantifying morphogenesis in 4D
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eLife, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.7554/elife.05864 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Barbier de Reuille, Anne-Lise Routier-Kierzkowska, Daniel Kierzkowski, George W Bassel, Thierry Schüpbach, Gerardo Tauriello, Namrata Bajpai, Sören Strauss, Alain Weber, Annamaria Kiss, Agata Burian, Hugo Hofhuis, Aleksandra Sapala, Marcin Lipowczan, Maria B Heimlicher, Sarah Robinson, Emmanuelle M Bayer, Konrad Basler, Petros Koumoutsakos, Adrienne HK Roeder, Tinri Aegerter-Wilmsen, Naomi Nakayama, Miltos Tsiantis, Angela Hay, Dorota Kwiatkowska, Ioannis Xenarios, Cris Kuhlemeier, Richard S Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 10% |
| United States | 9 | 10% |
| Germany | 6 | 6% |
| France | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 47 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 45 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 469 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 23% |
| Researcher | 94 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 14% |
| Unknown | 107 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 196 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 102 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 3% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 7% |
| Unknown | 111 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#578,661
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#1,739
of 15,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,480
of 279,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#18
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.